![]() Some report no difference in performance, but some swear by this method. ![]() Open Logic, then open Nicer, select Logic, and set the slider to HIGH. It allows you to set priority processing power to certain apps. In that same window try to set your Process Buffer Range to LARGE. Some have had good results with it checked, but for me personally it kills my performance. Go to Core Audio in your Devices tab of your Audio preferences, and try playing your projects with AND without the I/O Safety Buffer. Lots of people have been complaining about poor performance with Airport on after the last Airport Extreme card update. Turn off your Airport card and other programs. That's why a lot of people with brand new fast machines are complaining and other's with older slower machines are having good performance. ![]() They don't seem to get along nearly as well as Logic and Tiger. My personal opinion is that it doesn't have to do with someone's machine per se, but with Leopard and Logic specifically. If you want a lot of info, check out these threads. The point once again is that C 10s performance ( including disk performance ) is not as efficient as the other 2 DAWs when considering optimizing all possible settings in each DAW.This has been a really hot topic here and especially on the Apple forum. Look at the performance meters in Studio One and Logic which have no issues compared to the performance meter of Cubase 10s. We already identified in this thread that it’s the disk read over loads that are showing the issue in C10 on my system. This means Im also running an intel core-two duo processor. You seem to be obsessed that the only thing affecting a DAWs performance is plug ins. The real question is how good is your processor for some perspective, Im currently running a Mac with OSX 10.8 (mountain lion) with 8gb RAM and Logic Pro X. Why anyone would think it does is a mystery to me. This is just further evidence that the DAW has very little influence on the performance of plugins. I’ve gotten the same result with various versions of LPX going back quite a ways. Standard Price 1 310.99 Additional Inventory Request Lead Time Minimum Qty: 1 Multiples Of: 1 Unit Price: 310.990 /Reel of 100 Total Price: 310. I see you did you test on Logic Pro X 10.4.4.Īny chance you could run your test on Logic Pro X 10.4.5 to see if it’s the new version that provides better performance?īetter performance than what? Anyway, I get the same result with 10.4.5. Description B30, B595, Blk, 4' X 100 Ft Download Datasheet RoHS Compliant 3D Model / PCB Symbol In Stock: 1 Price Qty. Me doing your test just Compares my Hardware to your Hardware and that’s irrelevant. ![]() If that’s the best Cubase can do on my hardware… and the other DAWs have optimizations and settings that are working better then perhaps Cubase could improve in that department. Try my test and see if you observe a difference. Complete with a padded headband that maximises comfort, Comfortable Noise Cancelling Ear Defenders for Autism are an essential tool for managing difficult transitions through crowded, loud environments. These days, with hybrid buffers and asio guard, setting your buffer size to 512 does not mean you are using a buffer size of 512. Comfortable Noise Cancelling Ear Defenders for Autism. I understand, but that’s different than saying you used the same conditions in all 3 tests. While keeping the buffer setting at 512 I tried all different combination of options in the settings panel and that was the best Cubase could produce. Those DAWs have performance-related preferences that can affect a test like this. It’s possible you’ve found a difference, but the more likely explanation is you’ve got some settings different in your tests. Macintosh Performance - Cubase - Steinberg Forums My performance tests don’t show a difference.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |